首页> 外文OA文献 >Impact of community intervention to reduce patient delay time on use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction: rapid early action for coronary treatment (REACT) trial. REACT Study Group
【2h】

Impact of community intervention to reduce patient delay time on use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction: rapid early action for coronary treatment (REACT) trial. REACT Study Group

机译:社区干预对减少患者急性心肌梗死再灌注治疗延迟时间的影响:冠状动脉治疗(REaCT)试验的快速早期作用。 REaCT研究组

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a time-dependent intervention that can reduce infarct-related morbidity and mortality. Out-of-hospital patient delay from symptom onset until emergency department (ED) presentation may reduce the expected benefit of reperfusion therapy.OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a community educational intervention to reduce patient delay time on the use of reperfusion therapy for AMI.METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled community-based trial to enhance patient recognition of AMI symptoms and encourage early ED presentation with resultant increased reperfusion therapy rates for AMI. The study took place in 44 hospitals in 20 pair-matched communities in five U.S. geographic regions. Eligible study subjects were non-institutionalized patients without chest injury (aged \u3e or =30 years) who were admitted to participating hospitals and who received a hospital discharge diagnosis of AMI (ICD 410); n = 4,885. For outcome assessment, patients were excluded if they were without survival data (n = 402), enrolled in thrombolytic trials (n = 61), receiving reperfusion therapy \u3e12 hours after ED arrival (n = 628), or missing symptom onset or reperfusion times (n = 781). The applied intervention was an educational program targeting community organizations and the general public, high-risk patients, and health professionals in target communities. The primary outcome was a change in the proportion of AMI patients receiving early reperfusion therapy (i.e., within one hour of ED arrival or within six hours of symptom onset). Trends in reperfusion therapy rates were determined after adjustment for patient demographics, presenting blood pressure, cardiac history, and insurance status. Four-month baseline was compared with the 18-month intervention period.RESULTS: Of 3,013 selected AMI patients, 40% received reperfusion therapy. Eighteen percent received therapy within one hour of ED arrival (46% of treated patients), and 32% within six hours of symptom onset (80% of treated patients). No significant difference in the trends in reperfusion therapy rates was attributable to the intervention, although increases in early reperfusion therapy rates were noted during the first six months of the intervention. A significant association of early reperfusion therapy use with ambulance use was identified.CONCLUSIONS: Community-wide educational efforts to enhance patient response to AMI symptoms may not translate into sustained changes in reperfusion practices. However, an increased odds for early reperfusion therapy use during the initiation of the intervention and the association of early therapy with ambulance use suggest that reperfusion therapy rates can be enhanced.
机译:背景:急性心肌梗死(AMI)的再灌注治疗是一种依赖时间的干预措施,可以减少梗塞相关的发病率和死亡率。从症状发作到急诊科(ED)就诊的院外患者延误可能会降低再灌注治疗的预期收益。目的:确定社区教育干预措施以减少患者延误时间对AMI再灌注治疗的影响方法:这是一项基于社区的随机对照试验,旨在增强患者对AMI症状的认识,并鼓励早期ED表现,从而提高AMI的再灌注治疗率。这项研究在美国五个地理区域的20个配对配对社区的44家医院中进行。符合条件的研究对象是没有入院的无胸部损伤(年龄≥30岁)的患者,这些患者被纳入参与医院的医院并接受了出院AMI诊断(ICD 410); n = 4,885。对于结局评估,如果患者没有生存数据(n = 402),参加了溶栓试验(n = 61),在ED到达后12小时内接受再灌注治疗(n = 628),或缺少症状发作或再灌注,则将其排除在外。次(n = 781)。应用的干预措施是针对社区组织以及目标社区中的普通大众,高危患者和卫生专业人员的教育计划。主要结局是接受早期再灌注治疗(即ED到达一小时内或症状发作六小时内)的AMI患者比例发生变化。在调整患者的人口统计资料后,确定血压,心脏病史和保险状况,确定再灌注治疗率的趋势。结果:四个月的基线与18个月的干预期进行了比较。结果:在3013名选定的AMI患者中,有40%接受了再灌注治疗。 ED到达后一小时内接受治疗的占18%(占治疗患者的46%),症状发作六小时内占32%(占治疗患者的80%)。尽管在干预的前六个月中发现早期的再灌注治疗率有所提高,但是再灌注治疗率的趋势没有显着差异。结论:早期再灌注治疗与救护车的使用之间存在显着相关性。结论:社区范围内提高患者对AMI症状反应的教育努力未必会导致再灌注实践的持续变化。但是,在干预开始期间早期进行再灌注治疗的可能性增加,并且早期治疗与救护车的关联表明可以提高再灌注治疗的速度。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号